Being Reborn as Anarchy

Posted: 13th May 2011 by AJ in Uncategorized
Tags: , ,
0

I remember when I use to be a statist, though seemingly long ago it was just four years ago I snapped out of it. Wealth redistribution was moral, police were the good guys, soldiers protected us from foreign oppressors, central bank was a good idea, businesses were killing the planet, etc. How foolish I was.

What helped me snap out of it was a mixture of George Bush’s lies, Ron Paul getting me to read Austrian economics and his railroading by the main stream media, and then YouTube opened me up to anarchists & libertarians who made sense. From there I jumped off the cliff of statism to find an “invisible” bridge like the one from Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade. It was there all along I was just conditioned not to see it until I made the leap.

The belief in self ownership and no ruler or master was a shock to my system when I realized what I saying to myself. Everything I was taught and conditioned to believe about our world was manipulative lies to make me bend my knee to the government. I was angry and depressed that I was a mere serf. I realized why my favorite movie was the Matrix. My subconscious was aware on some level the world was not right. The shock came when I tried to expose others to it. I was attacked from all angles. Enemies would gang up on me. Liberal and conservatives join forces to talk down anarchists. I tried to talk with the left first, but that was utter failure. Then I tried the right because of Ron Paul, but even Ron Paul’s minarchist ideals were attacked, much less mine. I continue to educate those who will listen as they see the country spiral to it’s death.

Being an anarchist can be lonely at times. A minority position where the individual and not the majority matter most. The non-aggression principles are ignored in favor of aggression by humans with special titles and uniforms. Governments never work and never produce anything of value. Democracy, Republics, Monarchies, etc just do not work especially for the long haul. They cannot exist without threatening violence by the few against the many. They cannot exist without extracting resources and life from the productive.

A belief that says monopolies are bad unless they call themselves the government is extremely illogical. A belief that says violence in bad unless one calls themselves a government agent is barbaric. Statism is a barbaric relic and I hope if humans survive long enough they will look back and view our time as one of the rule by barbarians and sociopaths. I hope they feel sad for us, but learn from our destruction and aggression. Anarchy and not state socialism is progressive, misuse words all you want statists your time will come, your empires will keep collapsing, and you will keep causing misery despite what fuzzy words you use.

The spirit of liberty is in every human being and once it is lit hopefully it will burn bright in mass…someday.

Death of Osama bin Laden

Posted: 6th May 2011 by AJ in War & Conflict
Tags: , , , , ,
0

 Osama or Usama bin Laden‘s (whichever you prefer) death has been quite the eye opener in the United States. No matter how much you can hate people for acts they are accused of, unless there is a real trial to outlay the evidence with a judgment then justice has not been served. If Osama was indeed Charles Manson on a larger scale by getting others to kill for him then arrest him. Cheering for anyone to be shot while unarmed is barbaric at the least. Then the USA is the same country that shuns human nudity, which is natural, wants to see photos of murder which is unnatural. The Romans were fond of seeing and causing death too. We should ask them how that turns out…oh wait. The central power aka the Federal Government has conditioned people to worship war, death, and destruction as something that must be done and supported. While making people think peace, respect, and freedom as dangerous and weak. They even demean people unless you support their murderers for hire in the military. Human beings in general do not want to die or murder others. They need to be psychologically conditioned and pushed into these things with fear, payment, and breakdown of morality. This goes for people in any country. People with power learn this pretty easily. Eventually it comes to enemies’ trading death for death, where no one wins except the corporatists and banks that profit from it and governments that gain power from it.

 There has also been a precedent set where an American president openly admits to assassinating someone that is labeled evil and is cheered for it or at least given a pass for it. Assassination is just code word for a single purposeful murder, unlike war which is mass murder. Murder is never okay and the hatred against bin Laden has made people blind to blood lust. Once governments get away with something they expand upon that. People who fall under evil can expand and. I have no idea why people believe their government is different than the rest in history. All humans are weighed down by this thing called HUMAN nature. When humans gain too much power it has a psychological effect on their psyche, morality, and decision making. They start to feel superior to most people and can rationalize doing bad things for perceived good especially their own good. At this point I would assume Obama is just a straight corporatist with little to no morality about harming others as long as he and his friends have power and gain wealth over the masses. Osama was a power gain for the Federal Government they do not hate bin Laden, but needed his death as a propaganda tool. Well played except for the fact they could not even get the story straight then dumped the body mob style. The power structure has gotten so brazen and cocky they trip themselves up more often these days. People should have been in DC with “pitchforks”, but instead cheered waving their Imperial American flags, sad and disturbing. It is easy to join in the mob, but irrational. Keep your individuality and cheer life.

P.S. I am also no pacifict and believe in self defense, but not aggression.

Destructive Monopoly

Posted: 5th April 2011 by AJ in Corrupt System
Tags: , , ,
0

Definition of MONOPOLY (Merriam-Webster)

1: exclusive ownership through legal privilege, command of supply, or concerted action

2: exclusive possession or control

3: a commodity controlled by one party

 We are told to despise monopolies as they are evil organizations that will have high prices and not care about their customers. The problem is that this is correct more than anyone realizes, especially when it has a monopoly to commit violence. There is a powerful monopoly that does not care for the ones who pay it for services, their families, and mistreats them as it pushes them into debt and poverty. This monopoly exists right here in North America. It kidnaps people and their children. It locks up ones who have not harmed anyone. It even kills its customers with little or no punishment. It decides whether its own employees have harmed you and its decision is final. You can cry and feel degraded all you want, there is little you can do for compensation.

 This is a legal entity that submits society to its will. As long as most people believe it needs to exist then you are at its mercy if you anger it or it feels you owe it watch out! Hell if you disrespect one of its agents you may find yourself in a heap of trouble. The worst part is this entity is responsible for murder and one may even use the word genocide throughout its history not only against its own customers, but against people who did not want to do business with it. Some of the survivors of its reign of terror then in desperation attack the customers who make it legitimate just for revenge.

 The board of directors is largely unknown, but the CEO or President gets voted in every four years. The customers do have a say or at least it is assumed they do. Though none of them are allowed to be CEO, it has to be hand selected elite people who will run the organization as seen fit by the board and their talking heads. The customers try to pick the less evil one, but to no avail it always seems like the CEO works against them. Just so they do not feel guilty many of the customers will defend their CEO pick to put their mind at ease. It is a sad situation.

 Though one of the vilest parts of the institution is that the services provided are of poor quality and it constantly loses money. It makes the customers hand over more of their labor earnings and allow it to have more power over their lives to fix the problems. The customers keep doing this and things seem to keep getting worse. It is as if the entity provides bad services just to have an excuse so it can get more money and power for itself. The customers keep getting pushed into further poverty and yet keep begging the entity to save them. They have lost the ability to do for themselves or at least the knowledge that they can. They beg the monopoly to just use compassion and logic to make the world a better place!

 The monopoly ignores them because after all what can they do? The customers are weak and out gunned. They have become dependent on the monopoly like little children. The monopoly has its own interests and plans; the customers just better deal with it or they will be punished for their insolence. It feels they should be grateful for what privileges they do have. The customers may have the entity outnumbered, but they have their own tribal separations that keep them divided and in small manageable groups. The monopoly just tells them what they want to hear just so they stop nagging it. Then it goes back to business as usual.

 The customers (or serfs) are just human resources to be used by the superior people who run everything. Silly little customers just need to do as they are told or else the monopoly may get angry with them and lash out on a large scale. They pretend the ones who do stand up to the monopoly are crazy and deserve to be lashed out at. Though deep down it is only because they are scared of the monopoly and want to believe they can change the whim of the CEO one day to make the monopoly nicer to them. With all that power why would it do that? No it much rather stay on course it works out for a small group of people after all, they do not care what their resources think or feel.

 I think this monopoly is in financial trouble, but will suck as much life from its customers as it can before it allows itself to fail. Then maybe the customers will be so angry and upset it will finally stop believing in it. Though they may just prop up a new monopoly and start the process all over. Silly little customers….

 Oh yah….I forgot to mention the name of this monopoly, silly me. Its official name is the United States Federal Government or American Empire for short. Watch out for it and its friends, they are a bitch.

Statist Syndrome

Posted: 29th March 2011 by AJ in Corrupt System
Tags: , , ,
0

“In psychology, Stockholm syndrome is a term used to describe a paradoxical psychological phenomenon wherein hostages express adulation and have positive feelings towards their captors. These feelings are generally considered irrational in light of the danger or risk endured by the victims, who essentially mistake a lack of abuse from their captors as an act of kindness.” (Wikipedia)

 As a psychology student and anti-state I get frustrated when the idea of government and the people in government seem to be exempt from being reviewed in-depth by scientists in the field of psychology. That is the problem with science if you do not support the status quo you get no funding and will be blackballed by the likes of the American Psychological Association. This goes for all scientific fields. This is why when people say I believe in science and not religion means nothing because you went from one man made institution to another. Scientists are not all knowing and can be biased and manipulative like anyone else. This is especially true when they are given huge sums of money to prove something powerful people want them to prove.

Lately I have been doing my papers on the psychology of obedience and authority, along with real leadership. One paper I focused on the Nazi regime and people do not even like to discuss it because no one wants to face why the majority of the German people stood by and allowed Hitler to destroy their country and culture. There is a fear factor of course, but it is much deeper.

 When you see that police car drive up behind you, you get that slight adrenaline rush and your heart beats faster because you know that you are helpless against them even if they lie about why they pulled you over. Often you plead guilty no matter what just to avoid having to be thrown in front of the court and face the policeman again. People even recognize most police are just revenue officers of the government extorting more money through the help of never ending lists of laws. Though something interesting happens when you say things like the government is a monopolistic gang, police are thugs, the IRS are thieves, the military murders, etc…

 People go nuts in defending the government and their branches! People often say how corrupt, destructive, and abusive government can be then turn around to defend it in the same breath?! It is quite the psychological phenomenon. It reminds me of Stockholm syndrome except maybe it should be called statist syndrome, being the state has existed longer then Stockholm. It is so bad most people believe they are actually free and have a say in government. Yes I am sure your vote counts as much as the Rockefellers….not. It is an illusion. The people who run the State allow certain privileges to make you think you have (limited) choices. Vote for autocrat A or autocrat B, no real people sorry! Then as the government gets more powerful they will slowly erode those privileges and choices away. You can harm no one, but if you disobey the State for X reason they give themselves the right to attack you and lock you up. People have come to think government laws = morality when they are not connected at all. Government laws=control.

 If I was to assault someone for doing something I did not like people would go nuts, but if I have a government uniform on it is suddenly okay to do! If Charles Manson orders people to kill it is bad, but when the President does it then it is okay?! You cannot have two sets of rules for people with and without”special” uniforms on. If you do then you have a privileged class and a serfdom class. You are saying people with uniforms on are better and do not succumb to human nature like the rest of us serfs, which is impossible. Humans are humans. The more power they have the more it infects their human nature to act inhumane towards those with less power.

 The government class is a parasite on the productive serf class and if you dissent and claim you own your property or labor then you will be attacked and you will be killed or locked up. The government privileged class claims they own you, your labor, property you are on, and your family. If you claim otherwise you go from serf to slave real quickly.

 The masses have what most people know as Stockholm syndrome. They defend their captors as long as they do not become too violent and oppressive to the majority of serfs. For not being attacked or robbed too much, the masses of citizens will support their captors hoping that the violence will never be turned on 100%. They will rationalize it as long as possible because obedience is safe, while freedom takes guts and real living. No stronger armed coddling and being told what to do. Blaming the government is easy because when they ruin the world it was not your fault! Sorry rationalize it all you want. The government cannot exist without majority consent and obedience. The serfs outnumber the captors yet shake in fear.

Japan & Governments

Posted: 14th March 2011 by AJ in Corrupt System
Tags: , , , ,
0

It is a shame what has happened in Japan. This is one of those things that happen and it is sad. There is no such thing as perfect safety. Then on top of the Tsunami they have to worry about Nuclear meltdowns.

What no one seems to be mentioning though is why the Japanese government handed out money to build nuclear power plants in a potential earthquake zone. All you hear is how safe nuclear power is because it is almost impossible for them to meltdown (when built properly..Chernobyl). It is bad enough we create a toxic substance to run our lights and toasters, but then risk have Mother Nature put a crack (literally) into your plans on top of that?

When are people going to realize the bigger the government the bigger the mistakes they make. Time and time again central governments show how negligent, violent, greedy, and controlling they are. You think they made welfare to help people? No they made it to control people and to make people believe they are the good guys. Do you think they have compulsory education so everyone is equally educated? No they do it to control what you learn and shove in how great government is and how super awesome being a citizen is. Do you think you kid needs to be in school for 12 years to work in a cubicle? Do you think people could learn more being trained at their job of choice instead of sitting in lectures all day, bored to death?

Someone in the Japanese government probably got a good chunk of change to get them in a position to get Nuclear power plants built by the people who got them into their position! Or maybe they just bribed the right people after the fact who knows. Do not trust random strangers, but trust strangers with power over your lives? What kind of absurdity do we live in? Look at that guy with the nice smile I should get into his van, he has free candy! Look at that guy with the nice smile he is handing out free stuff I should let him run my life!

People expect government to protect them and when they do not there is always an excuse. People need to learn to be independent and stop listening to self righteous politicians who promise things (and we know they are lying) and say they will waive their magic wands to make the world hunky dory. More like keep us in constant fear and servitude so they live the good life with their handpicked cronies in the “private” and banking sectors. That is until they collapse everything because they think they can control everything. People, nature, and the world over works well and more efficiently in freedom. Human beings when try to control things such &^%^ things up.

Why the name Citizen88…

Posted: 5th March 2011 by AJ in Uncategorized
0

I equate the term citizen with prisoner and the numbers mean something to me, but are suppose to represent a prison number…

Serfdom in the USA

Posted: 2nd March 2011 by AJ in Corrupt System
Tags: , , , ,
0

According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary a serf is “someone part of a servile feudal class bound to land  and subject to the will of their owner. “

 For fun take out the world feudal from that definition and read on.

              I hate to break it to you, but here in the United States of America we are not as free as most claim. In Feudal times serfs thought they were pretty free too, at least compared to others. I often hear “if you do not like this country then leave it! Why don’t you move to Iran?” (or something along those lines). Instead of making arguments to why one believes they are free people resort to comparing their situation to others. Why is that? Deep down people know they are not free and it is easier to parrot catch phrases then to make a valid argument. It is not true to believe you are freer then say Iranians, but yes you have more privileges granted to you.

            One of the common things you see on conversations is people expressing their disgust with the government and wanting new people elected. When new people get elected….not much changes and people keep expressing disgust. Just for fun next time someone says “I hate the government and it is corrupt and destroying this country!” respond with” then get rid of the government”. Watch how many people go from hating the government to defending the government and reasons we need it. You can keep countering their arguments, but eventually people will hit a mental wall causing them to get angry or parrot catch phrases. It is always interesting.

            Two things in the USA you do not own, but free people would. Number 1: land. You think you can peacefully live on land and stake a claim to it? Nope this is not possible in the USA. The government claims ownership of all land and you can tell very easily. If you own your land then why do you pay property tax on it? If you refuse to pay this tax then what happens? Yes exactly. It will be taken from you and you will most likely have government umm employees attack you and you will not be allowed to use that land anymore. This essentially means you rent this land from a higher class of people or one could say we live in a modern day feudalistic society. By the way do you have the proper permits to build that, no? Then tear it down or else! Say those public servant employees that supposedly work for you.

            Number 2: Do you pay income tax? What is income essentially? The product of your labor, right? So essentially the government is claiming to own your labor and allows you to keep some of it. If you claim that you own all your labor, then what happens? Well the government will bring you to its courts and you will be ruled against then thrown in jail. If you refuse their courts then you will be assaulted and may die. Gee what would happen if a medieval serf claimed to own the land they worked on and keep the products of their labor? It would be pretty brutal for sure, but at least they weren’t slaves, right?

            As you can see my goal is to create questions to force one to break through the mental box that is crafted for us from birth or you can spew hateful words at me, whatever makes one feel better about your situation. Pretending you are free is easy because it fits into your world view and feels like a safe thing to believe. It also means you can pretend things aren’t too complicated in his world and all you need to do is vote for that one special human who will make everything better. One must realize players in the game of power will always evolve how they try and control people. This will be an ongoing series of course…

Libya Jeesh

Posted: 2nd March 2011 by AJ in Uncategorized
Tags:
0

Hey Libya listen to Hillary Clinton! Only the USA can hire mercenaries, stop copying! When do I get to hear Libya has weapons of Mass Destruction? I bet they are buried in their oil fields.

Philosophy of Mob Rule – Part I

Posted: 24th February 2011 by AJ in Mob Rule Series
Tags: , , , , ,
0

The way some people talk about democracy (the USA was designed as a Democratic Republic of course) you would think it was a new and grand idea of human intelligence. I am not writing to demonize democracy, but to point out flaws no one wants to discuss when designing a government around it. Ancient Athens, Greece is well known for being an early democracy and ancient Rome is well known for being a republic. They both failed. The more famous example of Rome as history shows went from a republic to an empire. The United States acts much like an empire enforcing its will on others militarily and economically. Like human beings anything we come up with will most likely have imperfections because it involves us. When we write up things such as the United States Constitution it looks good on paper. The problem is paper cannot defend itself. Words can be manipulated and changed by bright (cunning) minds. It could be viewed as what it does not say rather then what it does say, etc.

            Under democratic vote 51% (or a majority vote if more than two options are available) of people control what happens. This may be a majority, but 49% of people are no joke either. I call this tyranny by majority.  If you have 1,000,000 people voting and they all vote for President what can happen?  Candidate A is charismatic and fun, while Candidate B is smart and laid back. 51% of the population picks candidate A. 510,000- people force 490,000 people to live under the rule of someone they dislike. Candidate A turns out to be good with words, but shows bad leadership. Do 490,000 people have a right to rebel? Do they have to live with it? If of those 490,000 only 50,000 show the courage to rebel, is that okay?

            Of course there can be multiple candidates it usually ends up being a minority that rules for a majority. If you have many parties and only 43% is the lead percentage do they have a right to enforce their will on 57%? This just seems like the biggest mob tyrannizes the other smaller mobs or individuals. Tyranny by one or many is still tyranny. In the end your vote does not count unless you join the biggest mobs. In the United States they are republican and democrat. I for one am against both these parties therefore in the end my votes are irrelevant, unless of course I join a large mob. If I do not join a mob and rebel on my own what happens? My life is destroyed and I am jailed. I hear people say “then move”. That is not an argument it is merely a way to bully people into shutting up. Numbers make might which makes right it seems in this world. The belief in democracy has become a sort of religion. If you do not agree with their “God” of democracy then you will be ridiculed, you will be talked down. Intellectual discourse is not allowed. If a majority of people do not vote should that not mean a majority vote against the system in general? Nope, because of excuse A, B, or C.

            When atheists huff and puff they do not believe in God, I find most of them merely replaced their blind faith from religion to government. People who define themselves as liberals are most guilty of this, while I find Republicans combine the two which does not make sense. If someone like me is against both and I am focusing my attack on one side it is interesting. If you dare question Bush and his government republicans bash you and democrats pat you on the back, if you bash Obama then democrats bash you and republicans are now your buddies! It is very exhausting pissing off both large mobs with independents leaning one way or another. I am against overseas military spending I am unpatriotic! I am against welfare I must love human suffering! I do not lean right or left, I watch from above, where the brain is….yes that was my small jab for us out of the box thinkers! I will wait as the left hands and the right hands flip me off…..okay feel better? All I am saying is there has to be a different way to do things instead of repeating history over and over and over…..unless you want to argue the cycle is needed then bring it on.

            Though again I am not saying democracy is the worst I am merely saying it is an old ideal that has failed and will fail because people are so bent on fighting other mobs they ignore the centralization of power. People wish to have freedom, but do not want others to be free and/or become jealous of others. Not to mention people wanting to use power of government to crush other businesses and control the minds of youth.  People vote to give power to government to take each other’s money, property, make restricting laws, restrictive regulations, etc until everyone is weighed down by taxes, never ending laws, and have given too much power to the central government causing massive corruption in economics, education, and eventually everything. Why fight fair when you can just buy the favor of government power to manipulate the rules.  People also have developed blind faith in their parties and people vote for the one who is not as bad as the other instead of following great leaders. Leaders are born not elected.

To be continued….

“Protecting” Cyberspace?

Posted: 18th February 2011 by AJ in Corrupt System
Tags: , , , ,
0

The Federal government believes it should have control of every aspect of our lives, but not to worry because they always put in checks and balances….yah like that works out so well. It seems members of Congress banned together by the totalitarian wannabe Harry Reid (along with always evil Joe Lieberman, Susan Collins, and Tom Carper) to create the “Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset” bill. You have to love how they always add in those buzz words like “protecting” in their bill names. Have to love and feel touched how an independent, a republican, and a democrat managed to ban together to do this….*sarcasm alert*. This happens all the time because the left and right are not enemies just having some minor differing views. However, they both agree on more power and money for themselves and the central government. This bill is to essentially give more government control; I mean protection of the Internet.

I caught wind of this bill from Natural News. Natural News like many independent websites worries about these things because they do not want the powers that be to use bills like this to shut down their free speech. Although the FDA does its best to shut down sites like Natural News for telling us that non pharmaceuticals like nutrients in food can make you healthy, etc.  They also worry about the flow of information being controlled and free thought/speech being crushed (even more).

Politicians will keep bombarding us with bills with nice names until they slip them through unnoticed or they wear out the public to just submit. It does not even matter what the bill says now, all words can be manipulated or amended as they see fit to justify actions as time goes on.

The Feds have longed for some time to try and control the Internet. Controlling all knowledge and flow of information is what central governments want to do which is why they took over education. They create boxes where we are allowed to think, but the Internet has expanded people to think outside the box if they so choose. Even if you for some reason you like Bush and Obama and trust them with this type of power (not I), what about the next person and the next, etc….Human nature has shown the more that power is centralized the more corrupt it makes human beings who then want more power. This is what has happened in the USA and will continue to only make our society worse off with each passing year. Heck you might as well just call us an empire now with our overseas control, large military and gigantic central government with a gigantic debt they always create.

They will try and re-assure everyone we will not use this or that corruptly only in dire emergencies! Gee I wonder who gets to decide what constitutes an emergency? Anyways be aware of this latest gem and even if it fails look for its next reincarnation, heck maybe they will just slip it into another bill like they often do.

« Older Entries